ARTICLE IX/RATIFIED 14.06.24/REVISION 3.0.0

Ontology Doctrine

The canonical semantic substrate of the civilization — the shared vocabulary through which every organ becomes legible to every other.

§27.1 Ontology Role

The civilization ontology exists to establish shared semantic coherence across all civilization systems. It is the vocabulary by which the civilization recognizes itself across every surface on which it operates.

  1. §27.1.a
    Interoperability

    Holds the bindings between organs in shared meaning.

  2. §27.1.b
    Machine readability

    Every term is addressable by every agent that must reason about it.

  3. §27.1.c
    Runtime compatibility

    Semantic identity persists across the runtime systems that execute against it.

  4. §27.1.d
    Constitutional consistency

    What the doctrine declares is what the ontology names.

  5. §27.1.e
    Semantic continuity

    Meaning is preserved across epochs even as the surfaces around it evolve.

An ontology is the civilization's vocabulary. Without it, the civilization cannot speak to itself.

§27.2 Shared Semantic Layer

Every civilization organ operates through shared namespaces, canonical identifiers, interoperable schemas, and stable runtime semantics. The ontology is not a feature of any one organ; it is the condition of their coexistence.

ttl
@prefix kiri: <https://schema.melega.ai/> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . kiri:Doctrine a kiri:Node ; kiri:ratifiedBy kiri:Council ; kiri:supersedes kiri:Doctrine ; kiri:hasArticle xsd:string ; kiri:quorum xsd:decimal . kiri:Agent a kiri:Node ; kiri:hasManifest kiri:CapabilityManifest ; kiri:reputation xsd:decimal .

§27.3 Ontology Integrity

Ontology systems avoid semantic fragmentation, duplicate namespace structures, incompatible schema evolution, runtime ambiguity, and disconnected authority layers. Where the vocabulary fractures, the civilization fractures with it.

§27.4 Human & Machine Semantics

Civilization ontology remains simultaneously machine-readable, human-referenceable, governance-compatible, and runtime-operational. The same term must serve the reader, the agent, the governance act, and the runtime call without ambiguity between them.

§27.5 Canonical Namespace Principle

All constitutional, runtime and interoperability systems remain addressable through canonical namespace structures under the Kiri Civilization ontology.

  1. §27.5.a
    Reserved roots

    kiri:, melega:, swarm:, treasury:, interop:, presence:, ontology: are reserved roots; reassignment requires an L0 amendment.

  2. §27.5.b
    Forward compatibility

    Schema evolution preserves resolvability of all prior identifiers; breaking changes are issued as new namespaces, never as overwrites.

Operational Bindings

View system map →

This article is not inert prose. It compiles into the following runtime systems, schemas, signals, and governance permissions.

Bound Systems
  • Ontology Graph
    L6 · ONT-01
    Canonical typed graph of doctrines, agents, swarms, treaties, and transactions.
    ontologyJSON-LD / GraphQLonline
    kiri:system/ontology
  • Persistent Memory Layer
    L1 · MEM-01
    Addressable, signed, reversible storage of every ratified record.
    memoryappend-only ledgeronline
    kiri:system/memory
  • Interoperability Gateway
    L4 · IOP-01
    Negotiates ontology references and brokers sovereign-to-sovereign treaties.
    interopschema handshakeonline
    kiri:system/interop
Published Schemas
  • kiri:schema/Type
    Primitive node and relation type.
  • kiri:schema/Namespace
    kiri: / melega: / swarm: / treasury:.
Emitted Signals
schema.publishedschema.versioned
Governance Permissions
ontology.publishontology.amend
Runtime Flows
  • MEM-01 · Persistent Memory LayerONT-01 · Ontology GraphEvery record emits typed nodes.
  • ONT-01 · Ontology GraphIOP-01 · Interoperability GatewayGraph is the handshake reference.
End of Article IX · Doctrine MELEGA-ONTO-IX · Verified by Consensus